That margin was reduced slightly at 1440p, but even so the Radeon GPU was still 20% faster, which is a significant margin.ĪMD was able to maintain their advantage even at 4K, and the extra 12% you get out of the 6900 XT will be noticed by some gamers.Īnother new game we have for testing is God of War and this is a gorgeous looking game. Moving on to Forza Horizon 5, the 6900 XT pulled well ahead at 1080p with an impressive 149 fps on average making it 25% faster. At 4K where the Ampere architecture is often better utilized, the 3080 comes back to match the 6900 XT with 92 fps. Interestingly, that advantage was expanded slightly to 8% at 1440p, probably due to the game becoming less CPU bound. Despite that both GPUs pushed up well over 144 fps on average at 1440p, this time the Radeon GPU came out on top, though we're talking about a small 5% performance advantage. Next we have the ever popular Call of Duty Warzone and for this one, like most of the games tested, we're using the highest quality settings. This is an easy win for the GeForce GPU and it will be interesting to see if AMD manages to claw back any performance with future driver releases. Here the RTX 3080 12GB was 8% faster at 1080p, 20% faster at 1440p, and a massive 32% faster at 4K. Where you're really going to notice that gap though is at 4K, where the GeForce GPU offered a 16% performance bump, producing a ~60 fps experience.įor testing Total War Warhammer III we're running the built-in benchmark using the Battle scene and this is another new game that plays better on Nvidia hardware. The RTX 3080 12GB was 6% faster at 1080p and 10% faster at 1440p, so a reasonable performance advantage. For those of you targeting lower resolutions, both GPUs pushed well over 100 fps at 1080p and around 100 fps at 1440p. Benchmarksįirst up we have the new Dying Light 2 survival horror title. Instead we're going check out closely the results for about a dozen of them and then we'll see how these two GPUs compare head-to-head across all games in a single graph. We're not going to go over the data of all 50 games individually, as that would take you all day and it does get kind of repetitive. The driver versions used were Radeon Adrenalin 22.2.1 and GeForce Game Ready 511.79 as these were the latest available drivers when we started testing about a week ago. Both GPUs were tested at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K across 50 games using Windows 11. To make this comparison as fair as possible, the TUF Gaming will be run at the official clock specifications, so we'll be showing the stock performance of both products.įor all tests we used our Ryzen 9 5950X test system with 32GB of DDR4-3200 CL14 dual-rank, dual-channel memory. To answer that question we've got a new Asus RTX 3080 TUF Gaming OC 12GB graphics card on hand and we'll be comparing it to the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT. So if you have a large wad of cash you'd like to part with in exchange for a graphics card, which one should you buy? In other regions however like Australia, they're a close match. Though admittedly graphics card pricing is highly volatile right now, and we expect things to keep moving around in the weeks and months to come, hopefully for the better.īut as it stands right now, the typical asking price for the GeForce RTX 3080 12GB is $1600 to $1800 in the US, while the Radeon RX 6900 XT is around $1500 to $1600. If you're wondering why these two, that's because they're occupying roughly the same price point. Today we're getting back to what we love doing, big benchmark comparisons, and we're going to start with the GeForce RTX 3080 12GB and Radeon RX 6900 XT.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |